Jonas Brothers free essay sample

The Jonas Brothers are a hott young band that have the girls screaming. Why are theses boys so popular with the girls. Well its simple thay have amazing singing voices. The band are brother with the name Kevin, Joe and Nick Jonas. The have to cd two cds out. The first, one is called Its About Time and the second one is call Jonas Brothers. The boys became a hit in late 2005 and now are one of the most popular boy bands on the planet. So of the Jonas Brothers songs are Year 3000, When You Look Me In The Eyes, S.O.S., hats Just The Way We Roll and Mandy. On June 30th 2008 the boys with be in the Disney Channel moive Camp Rock. Also, they have a show coming out somtime in 2008 called J.O.N.A.S. I rate the Jonas Brothers perfect 10. Jonas Brothers free essay sample Screaming girls. Gymnastics, fire, and foam. Yes, Im talking about a Jonas Brothers concert. When I decided to go to a Jonas Brothers concert I should have known what I was getting myself into. Even before the Jonas Brothers hit the stage, hundreds of teenage girls were already texting proposals to Nick, Kevin, and Joe on the large screens above the stage that would later be used to show the flawless faces of the brothers. Although the Veronicas and Demi Lovato, both popular artists, opened for them, everyone was clearly awaiting the arrival of the Jonas Brothers, the reason we all came. The lights dim and everyone begins to scream. Whats going on? I have never heard a louder sound in all of my life; tens of thousands of fans shrieks pierce my ears. BOOM! The darkness slips away in the blink of an eye and is replaced with a ray of light, pyrotechnics. We will write a custom essay sample on Jonas Brothers or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The Jonas Brothers rise slowly as the screams seem to get even louder. The moment the first song starts, both teenagers and yes even the adults around me begin to sing every single word like its the Pledge of Allegiance and theyve been singing it their whole lives; even though the album was only dropped a few weeks ago. Dont get me wrong I was singing along too, who could resist theyre catchy songs. â€Å"Pushin Me Away†, â€Å"BB Good†, â€Å"Lovebug†, â€Å"Video Girl†, â€Å"A Little Bit Longer† and all of their other songs are almost impossible to not sing along to, or at least sing along to the chorus. They later announced that it was the last performance of their A Little Bit Longer tour. The multitalented brothers can play numerous instruments as well as do gymnastics, particularly Nick Jonas. By the end of the concert, Nick Jonas had played the guitar, piano, the drums, sang backup vocals in addition to being the lead vocalist of â€Å"A Little Bit Longer† (addressing his diagnosis with diabetes), and done multiple gymnastic tricks. When brought onstage for an encore, Joe Jonas was wearing a sumo wrestler costume, much to the delight of the crowd. Everyone got a good laugh out of that. It was hilarious! Overall the Jonas Brothers proved to be great performers, not once did I see any fan sit down in the one and a half hours that the Jonas Brothers performed. Bravo!

buy custom Empire or Republic essay

buy custom Empire or Republic essay Introduction US foreign policy was traditionally created to serve US national security, promote democracy in other countries, promote world peace, allow free markets and promote human rights. This concept is still practical in the US foreign policy when invading war-torn countries due to dictatorship. In addition, it is useful in raising and lowering the value of the dollar to compete and facilitate international trade and protecting lives through humanitarian efforts. America, as a country, had fought the autocracy of the ancient British Empire in becoming a republic where ultimate power is through the consent of the people who are governed. This is the essence of the US becoming a republic. In 1791, the US Congress revised its constitution to include the famous Bill of Rights, which was later adopted by many countries (Jerick, 2010). Its main purpose was to prevent abuse of power in the assigned branches of the US government. America had also designed branches of government that opposed each ot her, so that individuals or groups of people could not grow too powerful. The interest of these two opposing branches of the government ensured that the concerns of the citizens were fully expressed and solutions implemented. The system also prevented another case of colonialism that Americans suffered under the crown of the British. As America grew from a mere colony to the only superpower, her global influence and domain has largely expanded. The expansion has made America one of the most prosperous countries worldwide, but it came at a cost. America has legally declared war against other countries only seven times since its independence (Jerick, 2010). These wars have not only taken a toll on national treasure and blood, but also on the veracity of balances among branches of governments and other rights as provided by the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. Throughout the history of America, there has been a heated debate among academic scholars about foreign policy benefiting America or the world at large. Thesis statement: this research is intended to provide a view of the traditional perspectives of the US foreign policy, the significance of America in the global community, according to proponents, and concerns raised by critics in labeling it as a contemporary empire. Traditional Perspectives of US Foreign Policy National Security The US first priority in establishing strict foreign policy is due to the diverse threats to the interests of America. The security of Americans comes first, then the interests of the US in the national security. Threats are grouped into three categories: state-centered threats, transnational threats and, finally, threats possessed by weapons of mass destruction. State-centered threats occur when other countries have the desire and capabilities to threaten Americas vital interests via cross border aggression or coercion (Jerick, 2010). These states that threaten the US obtain biological, chemical or nuclear weapons all directed to the superpower. The US foreign policy allows the US to disable nuclear plants in foreign countries and neutralize chemical or biological weapons. It is argued that such weapons are created for the purpose of an impending war with a great rival, which is a superpower. Transnational threats are those that transcend national borders. The threats include terrorism, illegal arms trafficking, illicit drug trade, environmental damages directed to the citizens, frenzied refugee emigrations and international organized crime. The US government will investigate and arrest foreigners who commit transnational threats. Weapons of mass destruction are recent threats realized after the September 11th attacks. These threats pose the greatest potential risk to the global security, but mostly to the US national security. America reduces the threat of weapons of mass destruction by stopping the production of cutting-edge technologies of the countries that are hostile and capable of destroying the US. Some countries are outlaws in a sense that they strongly oppose global security interests and efforts. These countries advocate for terrorism, nuclear warfare, international crime organizations and biological or chemical weapons directed to civilians. Free Markets Prosperity in the 21st century for the US depends entirely on its ability to have a competitive advantage and win in all international markets. This means that the US implements foreign policy that enhances free access to international markets. America is the only country that has rapid growth in technology and education. Other countries depend on the US for most consumer products that cannot be produced in their countries. Emerging markets grow rapidly, and the increasing global economy provides massive opportunities for American workers and companies. The future of all countries in the world depends on the expanding global economy, which shows that almost 95% of the consumers worldwide live in foreign countries (Jerick, 2010). This means that the US uses foreign policy to export services, products and human capital to other countries, while the US economy is growing and sustained. Agreements are enforced and secured to enable Americans to trade and compete equitably in internationa l markets. Congress recognizes a President who implements strict foreign policy that breaks down international trade barriers, hence, creating good jobs for both, Americans and foreigners. In enhancing free markets, the US is implementing an agreement for high technology products that are exported to foreign markets. The Information Technology Agreement eliminated tariff on these products and a tax cut of five billion US dollars every year. The World Trade Organization concludes an agreement that facilitates the liberation of global trade, especially in telecommunications sector. Closed markets open up for competition principles and deregulation, championed by America. The US foreign policy sets high standards for countries to access free markets in terms of rules adherence and opening all closed markets. Democracy Dictatorships in the contemporary society degenerate social development, economic growth and education. The US foreign policy is implemented in countries where citizens are not free to trade, socialize and learn new technological developments from first world countries (Jerick, 2010). Democracy in other countries is essential to the US, because respect and freedom for human rights form a firm base for international trade, which contributes to the global economy. Countries that practice democracy often progress into becoming valued economic and diplomatic partners in the global community. Recent events of opening up new markets and facilitating the freedom from dictatorship include efforts in Iraq, Egypt and Libya. These countries were had closed markets and human rights were violated by strict dictators who had too much power. The US is integrated into European economic and security organizations, such as European Union (EU) and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). America depl oyed her military personnel to maintain peace and freedom in Libya, when Muamar Gadhafi refused to surrender and give his extensive power to the citizens of Libya. He was gunned down by NATO, and Libya is now a democratic and free country, which allows the US and other countries to trade freely and socialize with Libyans. In Egypt, Hussein Mubarak stepped down as the president to facilitate democracy, where citizens are allowed to vote for their preferred candidate and practice free trade with other countries in the global community. US foreign policy has helped to preserve the progress of foreign democratic countries, thus, allowing market economic reforms that benefit the global economy. Universal Human Rights The US foreign policy is implemented to sustain efforts that facilitate political liberalization, respect human rights and democracy. Multilateral institutions unite with the US in promoting universal adherence to democratic principles and human rights (Jerick, 2010). America helps the United Nations (UN) and other human rights organizations in making principles and standards that foreign countries need to adhere to, because their international behavior is globally accepted. The US works with human rights organizations to facilitate inernational standards for human rights that protect the traditionally oppressed or vulnerable members of the community, such as children, women, refugees, workers and people who are persecuted because of their religious affiliation or ethnic descent (Chomsky Herman, 1979). United Nations has a commission for human rights where permanent criminal courts that investigate, address and persecute violators of international human rights, such as war crimes in Darfur, Rwanda, Libya and Kenya. Recent research shows that sexual exploitation, especially of minors is rampant in the contemporary society. Children are abducted and transported to developed countries through dangerous methods, either through water or by road. Homeless women and children is an example of human rights violation. In Africa, female genital mutilation (FGM) is practiced in most nations as a culture, but this is violation of human rights, which the US and human rights organization fight hard to eliminate. The foreign policy of America encourages democratic governments to arrest offenders of war crimes and take them to international criminal courts for persecution. The latest event in war crimes is the arrest warrant of Omar Hassan Al Bashir who is responsible for the genocide in Darfur, Sudan. The UN and US are encouraging other African nations to arrest Omar Al Bashir when he steps on their land. In Kenya, offenders who were responsible for post-election violence in 2008 were rigged to the International Criminal Court during the confirmation hearings that would determine, whether the International community has a case that needs prosecution. World Peace World peace is the most essential aspect in the US foreign policy, because it prevents World War III and violation of human rights. Arms control in the US and foreign countries is under the strict control, while transparency surrounding the structure and size of military forces is enhanced. Controlling arms in countries facilitates nations confidence, reduces incentives for nations to engage in attacks and allows nations to direct human labor, finance and resources to more dynamic and safer international resources (Jerick, 2010). Weapons created by other nations, such as Russia, Korea and Iraq, are destabilized to reduce attack against developed countries. The US foreign policies against nuclear warheads favor America and other nations in terms of protecting human rights and allowing free trade across borders. Russia and the US are among the few countries that have the capabilities to create and disarm nuclear weapons. These two nations have implemented a strategy to destroy all nucl ear weapons, especially submarines and aircrafts that carry these weapons when attacking other nations. Data from Mainstream Theorists Benevolent Empire Robert Kagan is a mainstream theorist who believes that America is an empire, because of its great efforts put to control a world peace, global economy, great humanitarian efforts and promoting democracy. In his book the Benevolent Empire, Kagan reveals the state of the world after the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal with the former President Bill Clinton hit the media (1998). The international community watched keenly to see if the world would suddenly spur into chaos, because the leadership of the superpower was under controversy. Foreign dignitaries wondered if the peace process facilitated by President Clinton would stall, or the financial crisis in Asia would breakdown. Many people wondered whether the Peninsula in Korea would be unsettled. All these questions came from mainstream media who calculated the risks associated with a distracted super power. European, Middle East and Asian mainstream media temporarily stopped their irritable view of American hegemonic pretensions and arro gance (Kagan, 1998). They all paused to contemplate the risks and consequences associated with a crippled presidency from a super power. Many countries through their communications network expressed their fears due to a distracted supremacy. The absence of a supreme power proved to be a major global crisis as compared to having America as the only super power. Other alternatives did not suit the position of a supreme nation. Kagan asserts that people resent power, even when it is possessed by relatives or friends. He further explains this resentment as a timeless human emotion that goes hand in hand with arrogance vested power. The resentment of US power by other nations originates from its expansion after the Cold War. The US improved its economy, healthcare, technology and social life because of the ruins the British colony and the Cold War had left within its grasp. The US as a super power is essential and favorable to all countries as compared to alternative powers. A world that lacks U.S primacy or authority will have violence, disorders, dictatorships and economic downfall within itself. Kagan claims that it is better for a world that has U.S primacy than a world that does not have single authority or other alternative powers (1998). The US defense budget is higher than those of all other developed countries. This is because America is the main target of attack due to its power and international commitment made by the US to protect its allies. Kagan reports that 90% of American soldiers expelled Iraqs army during the Gulf War from Kuwait (1998). In Bosnia, America deployed troops to defend its interests because it is one of the US allies. Power and Weakness In the book Power and Weakness, Robert Kagan tries to differentiate the view of the world from Europeans side and from Americas perspective. Americans and Europeans have divergent views in terms of power. Europe does not seek to hold too much power, but it is moving to a position where rules, laws, cooperation and transnational negotiations turn the world into a self-contained system (Kagan, 2002). Europe wants to enter into a post-colonial paradise of relative prosperity and peace. The US remains stalled in history where security, order and power remain to the nation that has military might and possession of advanced weapons. Europeans fear that they no longer share the same culture with Americans in the sense that the US allows men and women to carry guns or store them in their houses. There is a warlike temperament with every defense situation and death penalties reigns in different states in America. Europe resolves crisis through diplomacy, but the US has weapons and military pe rsonnel to response quickly using force. The Unipolar Moment Charles Krauthammer asserts that America had to take the leading position after the Cold War due to its tactics and relationship with the global community (1990). He disputes the critics who view America as a self-serving country that takes advantage of its power. America, as a supreme nation, worked hard to attain its power. Power and preeminence in America are based on the amount of its military, political, diplomatic and economic assets that allow it to be the only player in making decisions during conflicts in different parts of the world (Krauthammer, 1990). The US took control of the Persian Gulf War that prevented Iraq from taking control of the Arabian Peninsula. Japan and Germany have threatened to be the super powers in the past, but economic dominance does not only constitute for primacy. Europe does not qualify to compete for primacy, because the methods it uses while solving conflict are old-fashioned and time consuming. Krauthammer continues to explain that the US deser ves to create the unipolar moment in a sense that when Kuwait was under fire during the Gulf War, Europe and Germany and the United Nations guaranteed nothing (1990). America deployed its troops, bribed and blackmailed Kuwaits rivals to win the war. The US took action and responsibility, because other countries ignored the plea of Kuwait, while the United Nations is present by name. Kuwait would have been written off if America did not step in as a primacy to help to solve its conflicts. Krauthammers foresight of Americas economic spiral does not occur to its expansion to foreign countries, but due to its defense budget, which serves its citizens and the nations allied to the US (1990). He further explains that the economy of the US fell because of domestic spending, such as the low tax creed imposed in the 1980s attached to its insatiable desire to improve the living standards of its citizens without paying the cost of luxurious lifestyles. Krauthammer later confirms that America i s not only an isollationist by geography, but also by the unfriendly conditions that its two neighbors displayed in ancient years (1990). Data from Critics Super Power Illusions Jack Matlock is an accomplished American diplomat who served as the US ambassador in the Soviet Union from 1987 to 1991 (Mandelbaum, 2010). Matlock advised a former President Ronald Reagan concerning Soviet affairs before he was stationed to Moscow. In his book Super Power Illusions, he harshly criticizes the Bush administration because of the September 11 terrorist attacks on the US citizens (2010). Matlock observes that Bush and his administration neglected the information provided by the CIA prior to the attacks because of extreme power vested in the US (2010). He compares President Barack Obama to the former President Ronald Reagan, whom he advised and reasoned with, in contrast to the previous President Bush. Matlock who was a close friend and advisor of President Ronald Reagan disputes the famous concept about the US using threats and military force to end the Cold War (Mandelbaum, 2010). He says in his book that the Cold War ended due to negotiations that benefitted both natio ns. He also denounces the notion that Presidents Ronald Reagan rhetoric actions in negotiations conquered communism. Matlock condemns the perception of the Americans regarding the fall of the Soviet Union as being equivalent to the US military victory (2010). The misconception of the end of the Cold War has led to pernicious consequences where Vladimir Putin asserts that Russia was weakened and destroyed by the West in the negotiations, hence, the existence of autocratic domestic policies imposed by President Putin and reflexive hostility by Russia towards the US (Matlock, 2010). The incorrect understanding of the end of the Cold War contributes to the exaggerated sense of the US power. This creates harmful foreign policies by the US in maintaining competitive advantage in global markets, deploying military troops in contemporary wars and raising the value of the dollars to oppress poor countries in international trade. Foreign Policy and the US Intelligence Chomsky Noam a harsh critic of US foreign policies states that America imposes foreign policies in the name of good international relations, but the underlining reason is for self-interests. The US foreign policy is intended for certain principles and ideals that reflect the interests of America. However, some of these policies cause more harm than good in violation of human rights, bad leadership and self-centered ideas. In cases that turn tragic, unfortunate or embarrassing, the US is quick to fix a solution right away, explaining that any event that threatens national security is dealt with using force and strict trade policies. When America deviates from its original purpose while implementing foreign policies, top scholars and government officials explain in intense details that tragic error was a deviation from the normal and deeply held ethics. In the Vietnam War, the US explained the great loss of civilian lives as a collateral damage when military action is sought (Andrews, 1976). The US claims that it lives beyond its moral resources in trying to defend itself or other allies. This makes the US fall into self-righteousness and hypocrisy. The wars in Vietnam and Iraq led to a great loss of life in the civilian population (Chomsky, 1982). This population encompasses children, women and innocent men who were caught in the middle of cross fire because of their countrys rivalry with the US. Many intellectuals believe that Americas use of power during the both wars in Iraq and Vietnam showed an abuse of power and immorality. This is the reason many people believe that America is amending its principles to dismantle its weapon power throughout the world. This is a pure fairytale created in the minds of people, believing that the media now possesses ultimate power as compared to the state. This myth about the media becoming the most powerful system is spreading to other nations, but in reality, the media neglected to report how the war in both, Vietnam and Ir aq affected civilian lives, until radical critics both, in the US and foreign nations raised their concerns (Terkel, 1984). Many intellectuals disregard the US when they seem to have failed in their morals, especially in the Vietnam War, but the truth is that the US did not fail in its efforts, it carried out its mission and succeeded. People who lived through the Vietnam War want to escape the US education system and media involvement, but the alternative is impossible, which is to extract facts from sources close to officials in the justice system. The Power Curse Giulio Gallarotti has a different perspective on the power theme by the US. Gallarotti is a Political Science professor at Wesleyan University and the author of the book The Power Curse (Mandelbaum, 2010). He acts as an observer of the global economy, where the US has taken a strategic position in controlling trade and policies in its exports. Gallarotti observes that the US has the resource curse in a sense that the US is the only nation that has large endowment of different valuable resources (2010). An example of valuable resource in this case is oil, which is derived from other countries that are poorer, hence, low in production. The US uses this oil in boosting its economy and lifestyle, but when it raises the value of its dollar, exports will not be valuable, because other poorer countries cannot afford to import such products from the US. Many countries cannot afford to import energy products from the U.S because of the high price. These countries impose their own foreign trad e policies, hence, making the US adopt such polices that will eventually weaken its economy in the global markets (Huntington et al., 1975). Gallorotti reports that the US accumulated power is a danger to itself, because the power makes other countries fall victims of extensive foreign policies imposed by the US and, finally, to withdraw from the global market. US citizens fall victims to the infamous moral hazards of trade. This means that gains, profits and revenues from economic activities with foreign markets are privatized, but losses are often socialized, especially to the government. Gallaroti implies that an individual or a company whose operations are based on moral hazards will engage in risky business deals, because of losses to be accounted for by other people (2010). The Bush administration weakened the US due to the intense foreign policies. Gallaroti writes in his book that the social welfare activities directed to the terrorist groups: Al-Qaeda, Hamas and Hezbollah, are legend in all Muslim communities worldwide, but the effects of policies imposed by these groups create a poor welfare for the people who are affected (2010). When Hamas assaulted Israel and the criticism of Egypt intensified, the two countries blocked the Gaza Strip, a power base for Hamas and a form of underworld for local citizens. Hezbollah began a war that was unprovoked on Israe,l and this caused extensive damage to human life and property in Beirut and whole Lebanon. Al Qaeda has continued to murder thousands of innocent Muslims after the terrorist attacks in the US (Mandelbaum, 2010). Conclusion The US is both, an empire and a republic due its role in the international community and the consequences associated with its actions. America is an empire, because it has the economic, political, military and social dominance to be a primacy. The world would be out of order if the US ceased to be preeminent. Other alternatives, such as Europe, Germany or Japan cannot provide the necessary force needed in maintaining peace and order. These countries cannot become super powers, because they lack the economic and military power to support the world in cases of conflicts. The US as a republic is an isolationist, because all foreign policies serve the interests of the Americans before those of foreign countries. Power enables the US to sustain a competitive advantage in the global markets, derive valuable resources from weak nations through force and declare war when it is solving security threats. The US will interfere with any nations operations when it pleases because as an isolationi st, it must focus on the interest of its citizens and its environment. This is because no country dares to oppose the US lest it wants economic downfall or military troops on its land. Buy custom Empire or Republic essay

Four simple tricks for new years resolutions that stick

Four simple tricks for new years resolutions that stick Four simple tricks for resolutions that stick Its that time again. A new year, a (seemingly) new beginning and a brand new chance to do everything a bit better. Clean slates are always appealing, and the turning of one year into another is as good a prompt as any to make a change – especially since it comes preloaded with tradition. Yet, as we all know, those early pledges to eat better, exercise more or spend less so often slip by mid-January, or even sooner. And the same is true at work. You may have aspirations to climb the career ladder, learn new skills, improve your communication, win more bids or achieve higher levels of customer satisfaction. So, how can you ensure that your work-related good intentions become a catalyst for real and lasting change, to make your business objectives for 2017 a reality? 1. You need to actually want it It sounds ridiculously obvious, but its so important. We often pick resolutions because we think we should behave a different way, or they may even be based on what someone else wants from us. But internal motivation tends to trump external: if your heart isnt really in achieving a goal, youre unlikely to succeed. 2. You need to be SMART Every project managers favourite mnemonic for goal setting is a great fit here too. So make your resolutions specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound. Many resolutions fail because theyre too big and too vague: be more productive is a fine aim, but what does that actually look like in your daily life? Break down lofty ambitions into small, specific actions youll take, including when, where and how youll do each – and how youll track it. Introduce one and build up: willpower is a limited resource, so dont spend it all at once. 3. You need to harness the power of habit Were all walking bundles of habits, amassed over a lifetime. Good or bad, they have become so ingrained theyre automatic. Like our willpower, our daily ability to make decisions is limited, and your mind will seek ways to cut down the number it must make. Once something is habitual, doing it no longer requires a decision – hence the power habit has over us. You can harness this tendency in a positive way with something New York University professor Peter Gollwitzer terms if-then planning. This just means lodging in your head a cue (the if) for the new behaviour you want to establish (the then). For example, if you have a report deadline on Friday, then thats your cue to start the structure of your report on Monday at 9.30am. Your mind will look for the prompt, and has to make only a little effort when it arrives, as the decisions been made. 4. You have to just do it Have you ever said to yourself something like, ‘I don’t have time to learn new skills with my current workload’? Or perhaps you’ve put off starting that online course because trying to get a grip on something you can’t do yet can feel pretty uncomfortable in the early stages. (I know I have.) One of the key killers of new year’s resolutions – or any decision to change – is procrastination. Its built in to the practice: we generally commit ourselves to these new ways when the actual moment of action is safely in the distance. At that point, it feels good. Were pleased with our pledge, and the fact that we dont have to act on it yet. When were faced with following through, that high is often long gone. So just expect that. And vow that even if it feels less than pleasant, then youll do it anyway. Once youve done it just a few times, youre already on the way to forming a new pattern. You might even like it. And if you still cant shake the Ill-just-start-it-tomorrow habit, try to take an objective look at why youre procrastinating. For instance, if its starting a report that youre putting off, whats behind that? Perhaps its fear of it not being perfect. (Heres a gentle insider tip: it wont be. But thats OK.) Or maybe its because you dont yet have all the information you need. In that case, make finding that information your first task, rather than actually writing anything. Of course, thats another example of breaking down overwhelming and broad tasks into small, manageable sub-tasks. Happy new career Back to the new you of 2017 then. If you have a career-related resolution like winning a promotion, making more of an impact with your business writing, or just not putting work off to the last minute, remember to break it down into smaller, specific steps. And if you need a bit of inspiration, here are some more resources to give you some help. Download our free, comprehensive guide to writing any business document. Try this technique when you really want your documents to make more impact. When you want to improve your quality control, make finishing writing your cue for this habit. Discover a specific way to enliven your documents and email, with ready-made if-then planning. Adopt these practices when you really want to take back control of your day. Improve your at-work communication and relationships by making these signs your cue to step away from email and pick up the phone. Tackle the big reason many new years resolutions fail (and generally stop wasting your valuable time). Gain confidence in your writing and invest in improving everything you write at work in specific, measurable, achievable, relevant regular actions with our online training, Emphasis 360. And get the first month at a third of the usual price here. If improving your writing at work is one of your objectives for 2017, see our business-writing courses for companies or for individuals for our range of options. You can also call us on +44 (0)1273 732 888 for a chat with one of our friendly learning advisers. Image credit: TanyaRozhnovskaya / Shutterstock

How Google Is Making Us Smarter Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

How Google Is Making Us Smarter - Research Paper Example Through the use of computer, tablet as well as Smartphone technology, children are able to learn new things spontaneously as well as in various modalities (Shirky, 3). Pat Wyman, best-selling author of Amazing Grades: 101 Best Ways to Improve Your Grades Faster, clearly maintains that the â€Å"21st century learners use all three learning modalities as they interact with technology†. As the children can learn by watching videos, reading or listening to audios, internet empowers them to learn in their best suited way and technology permits them to turn out to be better critical thinkers as they organize all the information they learn for school projects (Atlantic, 2). The curiosity of the children as well as their ability to absorb information has enabled them to understand topics or subjects that they normally would not due to increased accessibility to means of information. The children have developed online comprehension and reading skills that have made them smarter. Unlike the conventional modes of learning, for instance, books or tutorials from teachers, the information provided by the internet is unlimited. The internet technology is unlimited unlike the information that is garnered from teachers, adults and textbooks that is limited by time, cost and experience (Druin et al. 89).The best study resource ever developed is computer or internet. It is full of crucial information, provides boundless avenues of carrying out research and analyzing the desired results (Shirky, 3).

Application of conflict management Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Application of conflict management - Essay Example In the instance of two individuals disagreeing on the proper way to carry out a project, the main recognition is that the conflict manager identifies the disagreement as substantive. They would then aid the conflicting parties in developing a democratic and functional solution to the task problem. Another notable conflict management technique is the implementation of a model. Kuhn and Poole (2000, p. 558) indicate that an effective model is the integrative model. The integrative model views conflict resolution as not necessarily involving winners and losers, but rather the distribution of concessions in an integrative way. Following the above example where team members are disagreeing about the proper way forward for a team project an integrative solution would be most effective. In this way certain group members would be allowed to decide specific aspects of the group’s progress, while other group members would have different responsibilities. This way there would be no winne r or loser, but rather an integrative solution to the

Three Different Types of Transition Essay Example for Free

Three Different Types of Transition Essay Transitions in life are a fundamental part of development in children and young people. From an early age a child will experience some form of transition, and how well they deal with these changes as they are growing up will be depend on their stage of development, their confidence and the support and positive relationships they may have. The affects of transitions vary from child to child, so it is important to consider them on an individual basis. That said, it is possible to gain an idea of how a childs social development may be influenced by a range of changes and the type of transition must firstly be considered. Emotional for example bereavement, the divorce or separation of parents Many children will have experienced warm, consistent, predictable care and will see adults as reliable, supportive and caring. But when there is a major change within the family unit such as parents separating or divorcing, it can have such an impact on the parents that the childrens emotions may be forgotten. This can have a traumatic affect on them and its likely that a childs emotional development will be affected. They may start to misbehave at home and/or at school to seek attention or become shy and withdrawn and lose confidence. It may cause a long-term problem as some children may find it difficult to form trusting relationships with adults. Physical for example moving to a new home or class room From something as simple as moving on to a new activity within the classroom to moving to a new home, a child or young person may find physical transition traumatic and unsettling and may affect their development. If for example a child is progressing with age to a new school or moving to the next year group within the same school, the transition may have positive effects as they wont be making the changes alone, they will be with their friends. They will be able to see their old friends in the new environment and the transition will seem a lot less daunting and they will feel comfortable of their new surroundings more quickly. However, if the move is to a new school where they are making the transition on their own where they wont know anybody they could become shy and withdrawn. They may not want to join in any of the activities and be socially awkward. Intellectual for example moving from nursery to school, primary school to secondary school, secondary school to college or college to university Some children are unable cope with intellectual transition even if there are some familiarities such as still seeing their old friends. Progressing from primary school to secondary school or secondary school to college may be difficult for some children and young people to cope with. After having familiar surroundings of the same classroom and teacher for a year it suddenly all changes and may cause some children to panic. They may become shy and withdrawn or start to exhibit antisocial behaviour. Whatever the change or transition is, children should be given the opportunity to talk about what is going on, what is happening and how they are feeling. In some situations it can be discussed prior to the event, such as moving class or moving up a year. Giving children and young people the warning of what the change will entail and the opportunity for them to ask questions can reduce the harmful effects the change or transition may have on their development. In some cases, such as bereavement, talking with the child or young person prior to the event may not be possible. However, the opportunity for them to discuss what has happened and how they are feeling should still be given. It is important that all children and young people have positive relationships during periods of transition.

America Online Inc., Essay -- Business Case Study Marketing, solution

Strategy Analysis of America Online Inc. Prior to 1995, AOL was very successful in the commercial online industry relative to its competitors CompuServe and Prodigy primarily because of its pricing rate structure which was the easiest for customers to understand and plan for ahead of time. CompuServe and Prodigy offered the same pricing as AOL for its standard service, but, charged additional fees for premium services and downloading which made it more difficult for customers to anticipate their monthly spending. The key changes taking place in the online industry in 1995 are the introduction of the Microsoft network and the coming of use of the Internet World Wide Web which offered alternative channels to content providers that provided more control over their offerings and potentially higher revenues. Microsoft Network took only a 30% commission fee (versus 80% taken by AOL from its content providers’ revenues) from its content providers and offered providers the option of choosing any format and font to display their content (versus the standard screen displays offered by AOL and its rivals). Also, the per-hour pricing policy offered by Microsoft was superior to AOL’s. With the development underway of a way to provide on-line currency collection, the World Wide Web offered huge incentives for providers to start publishing material on the internet by their own means without having to go through a middle-man such as an online provider. Both of these offerings do not bode well f or AOL’s future prospects due to the huge incentives for customers and content providers to switch to these alternative distribution channels. Prior to 1995, there is substantial evidence in the case (Exhibit 2 in the case) to suggest that the benefits of the expense of the free-trial CD marketing programs in acquiring customers will accrue over multiple periods. The average lifetime of a user was projected to be approximately 32 months (prior to 1995) and this makes a strong case, in my opinion, for capitalizing these expenses, as AOL did. With the advent of competition, as discussed earlier, compounded with the difficulty of retaining retail customers, especially online, it is highly unlikely that AOL’s customers are likely to stay for an extended period of time just because of the initial inducements. Hence, I would recommend that the accounting policy be changed gradu... ... $87,471 Million Adjusted Book Value of Capital = Book Value of Capital – Value of Subscriber Acquisition Costs Asset   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   = $239,754 M- $130,473 M = $109,281 Million   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Subscriber Acquisition Costs Capitalized  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Subscriber Acquisition Costs Expensed Return on Assets (ROA)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  (19,294)(1-.34)/406,464 = -3.13%  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  (70,131)(1-.34)/ 275,991 = -17% Return on Equity (ROE)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  (33,647)/217,944 = -15.44%  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  (84,484) /87,471 = -97% Return on Capital (ROC)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  (19,294)(1-.34)/ (21,810+217,944) = -5.31%  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  (70,131)(1-.34)/109,281 = -42% C.3 Differential Tax Benefit Subscriber Acquisition Costs in 1995 = $111,761 million Amortization of Subscriber Acquisition Costs in 1995 = $60,924 million Tax Deduction if Subscriber Acquisition Costs were expensed = $111,761 million * 0.34 = $ 37,999 million Tax Deduction if Subscriber Acquisition Costs were capitalized = $60,924 million * 0.34 = $ 20,714 million By expensing instead of capitalizing, AOL is able to derive a much larger tax benefit ($37,999 million instead of $20,714 million). The differential tax benefit can be written as: Differential Tax Benefit = $37,999 - $20,714 = $17,285 million